God Bloggers?

Let the navelgazing begin....

I feel like I’m too new at this game to get pigeonholed as any particular flavor of writer. So while I may be a Christian who, from time to time, will write about his faith on the interweb, I don’t know that I aspire to the category of “Christian God Blogger.” (Although I’ll happily declare myself Benevolent Grand Poobah of the Wallis and Gromit fanclub.)

The New York Times loves the CGB idea, it seems, devoting a story in yesterday’s paper to bloggers of varying faiths. In the article, the director of the Pew Internet and American Life Project estimates that 10 to 20 percent of blogs are “related to religion.” Seems like a pretty vague categorization to me, but nobody’s gonna put me in charge of anything at Pew anytime soon, so it is what it is, I guess.

I will admit that I particularly enjoy reading sites where people personally, publicly and regularly wrestle with God. All you have to do is to start clicking on the links to the right, and you’ll see that several of the sites I’ve posted so far could be described thusly. I think what I’ve valued most about some of these sites has been the community that they offer, even for people like me who lurked for months before joining in. I don’t think it’s any subsitute for a physical community centered on a local church. But it’s an awfully nice complement.

These sites (and dozens of others that I keep tabs on) have also allowed me to cross paths with ideas, arguments and doctrines that I would ordinarily have missed by camping out in my own little corner of Christendom. They’ve given me a lot to think about and they’ve inflated my reading list something fierce. And while I’m not sure how comfortable I am with the term “God Blogger,” I can only hope to be the kind of writer who might do the same for people who stumble upon this site. We’ll see if I have it in me. If not, then maybe I’ll aim to inflate your CD collection instead.

One more note about The New York Times article.... I’m sure that it might be a wonderful event where people can make connections, swap visions, and build community. But I’ve gotta say — and I’ll try to put this delicately — the name GodBlogCon makes me want to chew my own arm off. OK, that wasn’t so delicate, but it really is an awful name. Couldn’t they have chosen something catchier, like the Mormons with their Bloggernacle?

Hell, even Blogvention is a better name than that.

Dubious Honors from Google

I’m not really sure what this says about me. Currently, I’m second on the Google listings for anyone searching for Wallis and Gromit and the Curse of the Wererabbit.

I suppose it was only a matter of time before Jim fell into the evil clutches of librul Hollywood. Even if, in this case, evil librul Hollywood is represented by an unassuming British claymationist.

Friday Random 10

This has always been one of those memes that seemed like it might be fun if I ever got off my ass and built me a website. So now that this baby’s up and running, I figured I might as well give it a spin. I know I’m a little late to the party, so if you’re already tired of this, thanks for indulging me.

I forget where I saw this first, but the basic idea is that you turn on your iPod or music player, put your entire collection on shuffle and post the first 10 songs that come up. If you feel like playing along at home, you can post your list on your own site or leave it in the comments.

So, without further ado, my first Friday Random 10.

  1. Gagging Order - Radiohead
  2. One in a Million - Adem
  3. Sad Love - Crooked Fingers
  4. My Kind of Heaven - Jeffrey Foucault & Kris Delmhorst
  5. Stop Me - Brownie Mary
  6. Margot Known as Missy - The Judybats
  7. It’s Oh So Quiet - Björk
  8. Even Better Than the Real Thing - U2
  9. Cradle and All (Live) - Ani DiFranco
  10. Reunion Hill - Richard Shindell

So… whatcha got?

“Give Me a Break!”

Well, the Ten Commandments are making news again. The Supreme Court heard arguments today regarding whether or not it’s constitutional for displays of the Ten Commandments to appear on government property.

I can’t say that I really have a dog in this fight. I don’t find the displays terribly objectionable, but I don’t know that I’d fight that hard to make the case that they belong on government property. As I read about the case today, I was interested to find that in the instance of the Texas monument, it was one of hundreds of such monuments constructed throught the country in the 1950s by the Fraternal Order of Eagles. A quick search of the FOE (seriously, couldn’t they come up with a less ominous acronym?) website turned up a little history behind the genesis of these monuments:

The F.O.E. began its Ten Commandments program in 1951, thanks to Judge E.J. Ruegemer of St. Cloud, Minnesota, member of local Aerie 622, past Grand Aerie officer, member of the Eagle Hall of Fame and onetime chairman of the Eagles National Commission on Youth Guidance. Appearing in Judge Ruegemer’s court one day was a teenager charges [sic] with auto theft. When Judge Ruegemer asked if he realized he had broken the Ten Commandments, the young defendant said he had never even heard of them. The judge promptly sentenced him to learn and live by them, and the boy was never in trouble again.

At Judge Ruegemer’s behest, Minnesota Eagles sponsored the distribution of copies of the Ten Commandments to state courtrooms for the guidance of defendants. The State Aerie adopted the program in 1951, and it grew so rapidly in popularity that the Grand Aerie soon enthusiastically got behind it at the national level.

When famous Hollywood director Cecil B. DeMille, then making the movie “The Ten Commandments,” heard about it, he contacted Judge Ruegemer about having granite monoliths engraved with the Ten Commandments and placing them in courthouse squares, at city halls and in public parks around the country.

Micah at McCarty Musings has already written an amusing take on these monuments as movie promotions (also, he refers to the commandments as the “Big 10,” which makes me smile). So I won’t dwell on the delicious absurdity of that aspect of this story.

But I will say that, while I’m fairly neutral regarding the monuments themselves, it seems to me that Eagle Hall of Famer Ruegemer’s courtroom manner was out of place. I’m by no means a legal scholar, but the fact that the teenager happened to break the Ten Commandments at the same time he was violating federal or state law seems irrelevant. And if you can’t make a compelling case for why auto theft is illegal without turning to the Big 10, I’m not sure you should be banging a gavel.

Ultimately, the more I read about this story, the more I was reminded of something Kurt Vonnegut wrote last year in In These Times:

For some reason, the most vocal Christians among us never mention the Beatitudes. But, often with tears in their eyes, they demand that the Ten Commandments be posted in public buildings. And of course that’s Moses, not Jesus. I haven’t heard one of them demand that the Sermon on the Mount, the Beatitudes, be posted anywhere.

“Blessed are the merciful” in a courtroom? “Blessed are the peacemakers” in the Pentagon? Give me a break!

That’s all. What, like I’m gonna improve on Vonnegut?

Update: Looks like Richard Mouw is thinking along the same lines. However, while I merely made the connection between the Court case and Vonnegut, Mouw takes that connection into modest proposal territory. Which is one of the innumerable reasons why he is Richard Mouw and I am not. (Via Jesus Politics)

The Oscars seemed fairly uninteresting this year. Perhaps it was because we only saw one of the films nominated for Best Picture. Honestly, the only award I was really pulling for was Charlie Kauffman for his Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind screenplay.

Fortunately, I reccntly stumbled across two sets of trailers that have me excited about the movie year to come. Only one of the movies looks Oscar-worthy. I’ll let you figure out which.

I must admit that I’m pretty nervous about the forthcoming film adaptation of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, if only because I adore the books. But now that I’ve seen the first two trailers, I’m actually getting excited. The second trailer pokes fun at movie trailers in general (not quite at the level of the brilliant Comedian trailer, but its still funny in its own right).

Martin Freeman is a great choice for Arthur, although I’m worried that I might not be able to see him as anything but Tim from The Office. I’m a little less sold on the casting for Zaphod and Ford. I imagine that Zaphod will be the toughest character to get across onscreen. And while Sam Rockwell seems to get the attitude right in the trailers (when he’s not sounding like Shaggy), I never got a good look at his extra, um, features. And I know next to nothing about Mos Def, so Ford remains a big question mark for me.

Now they could still screw this one up royally. But so far, I’ve seen no cause for panic. I really should read the books one last time before the movie changes my ability to visualize them on my own.

I have absolutely no conflicting feelings about the second movie — just unmitigated joy. This fall marks the release of The Wallace & Gromit Movie: Curse of the Wererabbit! The official site has a behind-the-scenes glimpse. But that pales in comparison to the first trailer (note: this links directly to a Windows Media Video file). The gag at the end makes me laugh every time.

I have to say, it doesn’t hurt every now and then to start your day with a little unbridled glee. (Glee courtesy of Looking Closer.)

Update: Looking Closer again comes through with the glee, linking to a splendiferous 52mb Quicktime version of the second Hitchhiker’s trailer (note: direct link to Quicktime file). Wow.

Senryu for Bono

new album is great
except one thing still bugs me
what is a tor-toice?

all because of you
kick-ass guitar, great lyrics
“tortoise” makes me cringe

my favorite song
ruined by a stupid rhyme
thanks a lot, bono!

bono for nobel?
peace, maybe, but not for lit
not with lazy rhymes

i know you might ask
if another rhyme might work
“porpoise” is right out!

The Edges of Our Lives

I saw Jim Wallis speak Friday night before a crowd of 500 or so in Berkeley. He spoke for about an hour and took questions (more than graciously handling the requisite Berkeley rantings in search of a question, including one that charged that our government was involved in the planning of 9/11). The evening had more of a rally feeling than I expected, which made me slightly uncomfortable for reasons that I can’t quite put my finger on yet. But his presentation was inspiring and provocative nonetheless. I don’t really have the time to write a full review of his talk right now, so I’ll save that for when I get around to starting his book.

But I’ll share one of the many things that he said that struck me. Mr. Wallis said that churches really only ask for the edges of our lives. And yet they’re surprised when that’s all they get from us. He thinks that this is a tragedy, and I guess I have to agree.

Update: If you missed Mr. Wallis when he came through your town or if his book tour didn’t include your area, Sojourners has posted a streaming video of his appearance in Menlo Park, a few days before I saw him in Berkeley. You can view the appearance here. His visit with Jon Stewart on The Daily Show is there as well. (Note: you’ll have to sign up for an email list before you will be able to access the Windows Media Video or the mp3 file of his appearance.)

What Good Am I?

I realize that writing this post means that my “Recent Post” list will now ask “What Good Am I?” and subsequently answer “I’m a Winner!” I’m just gonna have to chalk that one up to irony and forge ahead.

When I began this site a week or so ago, I mentioned that I was encouraged to do so by a series of thought-provoking music posts I had read earlier that day. This post will complete the trilogy of responses to those catalysts.

I’ve recently begun to read a site called ”A New Life Emerging,” which is written by a fellow Bay Area denizen named Rick. In the short time I’ve followed Rick’s writings, I have been regularly reminded of just how challenging Jesus’ gospel really is.

A week or so ago, Rick put up a post called ”Charity & Justice: What Good Am I?” that really hit me. He starts off with a powerful river metaphor for the difference between charity and justice. And I’m a sucker for powerful river metaphors. But the post really got me because he included the lyrics to my favorite song from my favorite Bob Dylan album.

What Good Am I?” from Bob Dylan’s Oh Mercy

What good am I if I’m like all the rest,
If I just turned away, when I see how you’re dressed,
If I shut myself off so I can’t hear you cry,
What good am I?

What good am I if I know and don’t do,
If I see and don’t say, if I look right through you,
If I turn a deaf ear to the thunderin’ sky,
What good am I?

What good am I while you softly weep
And I hear in my head what you say in your sleep,
And I freeze in the moment like the rest who don’t try,
What good am I?

What good am I then to others and me
If I’ve had every chance and yet still fail to see
If my hands tied must I not wonder within
Who tied them and why and where must I have been

What good am I if I say foolish things
And I laugh in the face of what sorrow brings
And I just turn my back while you silently die,
What good am I?

I’ve been working on a mix lately for some friends, and I’ve been listening to this album a lot. And I can’t listen to this song without thinking of a decision I face every day.

I work in downtown Berkeley. And while I have no statistical evidence for this claim, I think that Berkeley must rank with San Francisco as having one of the largest homeless populations in the country, at least on a per capita basis. I would imagine that the combination of a temperate winter climate and a relatively lenient civic policy towards the homeless has drawn a fairly significant number to our streets.

Which brings us to my daily decision. I probably pass somewhere between 3 to 8 homeless people every day. Now, I’ve lived in large cities for a decade or so. And you’d think that by now I’d have a pretty settled idea of how I should react when I’m asked for change. But truth be told, I don’t.

My usual response is to ignore the request and walk right past.

What good am I if I know and don’t do,
If I see and don’t say, if I look right through you?

Here’s the thing.... I’m a Christian, I’m more or less politically liberal, and I generally think of myself as a fairly compassionate person. My wife and I give money to local groups that minister to the homeless and we volunteer once or twice a month at a local soup kitchen. And yet I walk right on by. Worse, I make all sorts of excuses for the choice I make every day. Not that they’re good excuses. I have this vague notion that my change really won’t make that much of a difference, that it will go to support heaven knows what destructive habit they might have, that it will just be “wasted,” that they’re lying to me when they say they need money for bus fare so that they can make it to their job interview, that I’m encouraging behavior that is socially annoying and not “productive” or “independent,” and on and on.... Some of these are blatant stereotypes; some of these may have some semblance of truth. I’m not sure that it matters.

What good am I if I say foolish things
And I laugh in the face of what sorrow brings?

Today, for example, I passed only three. There was the elderly black man shaking a dixie cup across from the place where I get coffee. There was the bedraggled blonde gentleman in fatigues who was sitting in a vacant doorway outside the chinese restaurant where I got lunch. And there was the blind man who is on post every day a few blocks from where I work. I walked past them all. I did my best to avoid eye contact. I even took comfort in the fact that I had my iPod on, so I couldn’t hear them.

If I shut myself off so I can’t hear you cry,
What good am I?

There’s a passage in Matthew 25 that is probably familiar to many of you, whether you’re a Christian or not. Jesus more or less says that how we treat the least among us is proxy for how we treat Him. He says,

For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me. (Matthew 25:42-43, NIV)

It’s passages like this that have deeply influenced my personal politics. Chances are, if you come back to this site regularly over the course of the next few weeks, you’ll find me ranting about our government or about particular politicians or parties for their policies regarding the poor. But am I really any better? Have these passages influenced my life? If I knowingly pass by someone who needs a meal while listening to Bob Dylan through my white iPod headphones, am I pretty much giving Jesus the finger?

What good am I?

Honestly, I’d love to hear from any of you who live in cities and face this decision on a regular basis. I’d love to hear what you do and why. Since I’ve only had this shingle up for a week or so, I have no illusions that there are many people reading this, so even if you stumble across this post weeks or months from now, I’d still love to hear what you have to say.

I’m a Winner!

Thanks to the Pepsi iTunes Music Promotion and to a particularly lucky 20 oz. bottle of Mountain Dew (apparently about 0.7% of a lethal dose), I’ve won a free song at the iTunes Music Store.

Any song suggestions?

I’m really, really close to springing for Bright Eyes’ “Land Locked Blues” (thanks, Kristen), but the rest of the album sounds intriguing enough that I may just have to buy the whole thing.

Iron & Wine - Woman King EP

Sam Beam, the Floridian singer-songwriter behind Iron & Wine, has shown a remarkable ability to scrape away the outer layers of other songwriters’ material to lay bare the roughness beneath. I first encountered Iron & Wine on a B-side reinvention of the title track of The Postal Service’s Such Great Heights EP. Beam took an airy, hushed approach that brought to the surface an ache and longing that the original had hidden under laptop clicks and indie-pop hooks. Last December, I finally got the chance to see Iron & Wine perform live, and Beam gave a similar treatment to New Order’s “Love Vigilantes.” He didn’t so much cover the song as interpret it, speaking the song in a tongue that opened my eyes to the heartbreaking story New Order had obscured behind a veil of jaunty synthpop.

Since Iron & Wine’s 2002 debut album, The Creek Drank the Cradle, Sam Beam has gradually reinvented his own sound, lovingly polishing each successive release a little bit more than the last. In contrast to the rustic bygone-era sound of his early work, Iron & Wine’s Woman King EP practically shimmers. Beam finds eager new partners for his usual acoustic guitar and breathy vocals — ringing dulcimer arpeggios, raucous piano punctuation, even driving percussion. The final track barrels on to climax amidst a battle of droning fiddles and crunching electric guitars. While I would happily consume a half-dozen more Creeks, I have absolutely fallen in love with the lushly developed sound of this disc.

As the title suggests, Iron & Wine gives us six songs that are inhabited — even possessed — by women. And what women! A righteous regal warrior. A lusty, treacherous queen facing an ominous fate. Mary. Jezebel. Lilith. This is epic, mythic, Biblical territory. And Beam attacks these songs with the vigor that his heroines demand. Only “Jezebel” and “In My Lady’s House” harken back to the gentleness of his previous work. Yet even in Jezebel, the dogs roam hungrily just outside the window.

Woman King EP was released today on Sub Pop Records. Sub Pop offers a free mp3 download of the title track.

Words Fail Me

So in a previous thread today, I commented that sometimes I find that I ignore God because I’m too busy being outraged at the brokenness of the world around me to listen.

But that was before I discovered that old people hate America and love homosexuals.

If you’ve read the New York Times or been anywhere in the liberal blogosphere today, you’ve no doubt come across this story. Apparently, a conservative lobbying group has begun an ad campaign targeting the AARP, largely because the seniors’ organization has opposed President Bush’s hazy plan to carve private accounts out of Social Security.

Now I’ll admit that as someone who is decades away from even considering joining, I know little to nothing about the AARP. I have no real affection or animosity for them whatsoever. But whoever they are, it certainly doesn’t warrant the opening salvo in USANext’s forthcoming barrage.

I don’t even think I can bring myself to post the ad, so I’ll describe it. The ad contains two photos above a caption promising “The REAL AARP Agenda” and a plea to click for more details. The photo on the left is of a soldier in desert uniform. The photo on the right is of two men in tuxedos kissing. After you’ve been given a second or two to digest the ad, a big red X appears emblazoned over the soldier photo. Then, a big green checkmark appears over the two men kissing.

That’s it. That’s the first ad in what may end up being a $10 campaign to attack the AARP because of their stance on Social Security. It has nothing to do with Social Security. Nothing on the USANext home page makes the same connection. And not that you really need me to tell you this, but I could find nothing on the AARP site that suggested they took any stance on our military or on gay marriage. So the ad is specious. It’s so blatantly a smear campaign, it’s almost parody. And I simply don’t have enough synonyms for just how absurdly beyond the pale this is.

So who are these fine citizens at USANext? Josh Marshall has made the Social Security issue a bit of a personal crusade, so it’s not surprising that he’s the go-to source for this. The group has ties to the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, the Reagan and Bush I administrations, the pharmaceutical industry, and — wait for it — they’re headed up by the former Executive Vice President at Focus on the Family.

My site is too new for me to have had the time to write about the Social Security issue. But now that I’ve seen this ad, I sure don’t want any of my money to go to them soldier-hatin’ gay-lovin’ fogies.

Sheesh.

Literary Update: If you’ve read this far and you’re a Vonnegut fan (and by that, I mean a Vonnegut fan who’s even read the short stories), then you should check out Publius’ USANextian spoof of “Harrison Bergeron” over at Legal Fiction.

Additional Update: It looks like the ad has been pulled from the American Spectator site, where it had appeared yesterday. I’d like to think someone had a change of heart. But USANext seeks to be the ”dynamite” that removes the AARP as a “boulder in the middle of the highway to personal savings accounts.” So it could always get worse. In any event, is the President’s plan in so much trouble that some of his supporters have to resort to these tactics? If his Social Security ideas are indeed the right thing for our country, he should be able to play all his cards face up and win the argument on the merits. That would be refreshing, wouldn’t it?

Waggly Tail Extra

Not much time for posting today, but I’ll pass on this bit of silliness from McSweeney’s Lists:

Little-Known Song Titles That Answer Questions Posed in Better-Known Songs

“The Answer to Your First Query Is That Love, Like All Emotions, Is Inherently Irrational, and Thus Seems Particularly Well-Suited to Be Felt by Fools. I Decline to Answer Your Second Query, on the Grounds That It Is Homophobic”

Pure gold. (Well, except for the ones I haven’t figured out yet, namely 12, 14, 16 and quite possibly 15. Suggestions welcome in the comments.)

And for the record, the author’s name is Jacob. Just sayin’.

A Solemn Vow…

Since we’re new to each other, I make this promise to you…

Not all of my posts will be that long.

And I read things written by people not named Brandon. Really, I do.

Page 35 of 36 pages « First  <  33 34 35 36 >