This Is Good News, I Think
After months of dragging its feet over what the proper response should be in the Sudan, the United Nations has finally taken a huge step in addressing the horrific plight of the people of the Darfur region. By a unanimous vote, the Security Council voted to commit an initial peacekeeping force of 10,000 to enforce the current tenuous North/South cease-fire and hopefully provide greater protection in Darfur against continued attacks from the Janjaweed.
I’ve been meaning to write about Sudan for a few weeks, but it’s been amazingly frustrating to watch the world move so slowly to respond, and it has seemed like there’s been nothing new to write about for so long. Until this news, that is. I think that this must be seen as only a first step, and not one that is in and of itself sufficient to bring an end to the atrocities in Sudan. After all, there was a U.N. peacekeeping mission in Rwanda, and we know how that turned out. But it’s a start.
In general, I support the idea of the United Nations. But this has been one of those maddening situations where the deadlock caused by the interests of the indiviual member nations in the Security Council has led to thousands of additional deaths through inaction. The only reason that this resolution passed is because it didn’t include any language regarding sanctions (sure to be vetoed by Russia, China and Algeria) or the International Criminal Court (sure to be vetoed by the Bush administration).
As I’ve mentioned before, I’m not yet a pacifict. But I’ll admit that I’m wrestling with whether a Christian can advocate for military solutions to the world’s problems, while still working through the church to model a peaceable kingdom in contrast to the world’s ethic of violence. I’ve been challenged on this issue by reading some of Miroslav Volf’s wrtings and by some of the discussions over at greg’s place. Those discussions in particular have considerably expanded my list of books to read, so I look forward to wrestling with and writing about this idea more in the future.
One of the reasons I’m not sure I can fully embrace Christian pacifism is precisely because of situations like this one in Sudan. I certainly know that the addition of thousands of armed troops to an already tense landscape can cause further chaos and death. But I really believe that not sending troops would allow the situation to deteriorate faster and the killing, raping and displacement to continue unchallenged.
This is particularly important now, because just this week, Sudan expert Eric Reeves reported that “Khartoum has ambitions plans for accelerating the obstruction of humanitarian access by means of orchestrated violence and insecurity, including the use of targeted violence against humanitarian aid workers.” And on Tuesday, a USAID worker was shot in the face when her convoy was ambushed by gunmen.
It seems to me that these humanitarian groups have three options: stay and help as many people as possible, regardless of the escalating danger; pack up and leave, for fear of their own safety; or hope that a peacekeeping force can provide the necessary cover under which to continue their necessary work. It may be you could argue that the first of these is the most consistent with Jesus’ teaching. But I still believe strongly that there’s the most hope for success in the last option.
Anyhow, if you are interested in staying informed about events in Sudan, I’d recommend a few resources:
- Coalition for Darfur — a collaboration between liberal and conservative bloggers to inform the rest of the blog community and raise money for Save the Children
- SudanReeves.org — the personal page of Smith Professor Eric Reeves, who has spent the last several years researching and writing about Sudan.
- Save Darfur
- The Passion of the Present
If you’re interested in donating to groups operating in Sudan, you can donate to Save the Children through the Coalition for Darfur link mentioned above or by visiting InterAction for a list of member organizations doing relief work in Sudan and refugee camps in Chad. By going through InterAction, you are assured that the organizations are reputable groups that meet certain standards. But by all means, feel free to do your own research before giving.
2 Ripples from “This Is Good News, I Think”
Kevin says:
March 26, 2005 at 11:03 am
Well, I would say you can look at pacifism from a Christian perspective in a number of ways. One would be that only Christians should only be pacifists. In other words, we’re probably not going to be able to stop governments from engaging in wars. But that doesn’t mean we have to participate. In a situation like this, the job of the Christian would be to help families on the ground by providing basic necessities like food, clothing and shelter, by helping families to escape, and by being willing to take a bullet so that another might live. The job of the Christian would not be to take up a gun and fight back, or to join the military. Some would probably argue that using the military as cover would be wrong or that it wouldn’t be pure pacifism. I don’t know how I feel about that yet. But it would certainly be a step in the right direction for Christians not to be the ones pulling the trigger.
zalm says:
March 26, 2005 at 8:03 pm
i guess i’m torn right now between thinking of this as a student of foreign policy and as a christian. and while i might want the u.s. to be more humble, more compassionate and less militaristic in its relationships with other nations, and while i think the church can be a prophetic voice speaking out against the violence and greed and hatred that often influences our foreign policy, i still wonder whether a nation pursues pacifism at its own peril, whether situations like the one in the sudan demand a military component to their solution, and whether “carrying your enemy’s pack” makes for bad foreign policy.
maybe i’m mistakenly conflating individual ethics with foreign policy principles on a nation-state level and i’ve got me some untangling to do. or perhaps i just need to read yoder and bonhoeffer and hauerwas and volf and write more once i have.
note: first sentence edited slightly for clarity and because i have that power - 9:07pm
-----